Some Strategies for Carrying of the Huge Luggage of Social Media

By

Obododimma Oha

With the advancement of Internet technology into social media communication, often regarded as citizen journalism, have come all kinds of headaches. Any reptile armed with an android – probably bought from gbanjo sales (a Nigerian auction) – connected to the Internet, is now a warrior and can lure you into an unnecessary argument on Facebook or WhatsApp. Let me not plunge into that negative pool yet. Let me first acknowledge that citizen journalism is very good for this time, especially to break the monopoly of governments and some privileged individuals over news affecting our lives; in fact, in defining for us what makes “news” and what does not. Given that censorious governments want to order or control your view of reality as a citizen, where else or in what direction do they look if not at information – to hide or distort it; to privilege that which favours them or leave out that which does not; to make silence preferable to eloquence? Even privileged individuals that own news industries would do their own strategic news production and you remain the victim. Unless and when they find brown envelopes or transfers to their accounts, be sure that that news, if reported, would be minus or plus!

Given this unfortunate picture where the “consumer” of news is the victim, the advent of social media as free subscriber enterprise is highly welcome. In the first place, one is liberated from news tyranny. This is not a good day for tyrannical governments that try to control information as a way of controlling one’s life! So, everybody could be a source or reporter of news? So, that incident reported by that insignificant fellow on Facebook has caught global attention? So, the government now has an additional headache and would deploy agents to hunt disseminators of news that should not have seen the light of day? Bad day, indeed!

For me, it is OK. Shouldn’t Jerry spend his life going after Tom? And is part of the entertainment not seen in the fact that Jerry gets hurt or falls victim to his own machination, a victim of his own plans against Tom? It is really part of the entertainment and part of the politics of the news.

So, everyone is a reporter, instead of those “entrusted” with the definition of “newsworthiness”? You would think that this is a big problem, given that there would be information deluge. Where does one see Jonah to teach one how to build an ark to handle this kind of deluge? It could be depressing, not only for governments or government agents who are involved in playing Tom and Jerry, but for ordinary consumers out there. Almost every split second the post lands on one’s phone. The alert sounds on WhatsApp, Facebook, imo, Instagram, Telegram, etc and one has to learn to manage all these. Wives that are cooking may forget to add salt in the process of checking the phone to see this or that update. Even students that are supposed to read their books and pass examinations are equally distracted. While crossing the road, they are punching the buttons and listening to music. Look out so that you won’t knock down somebody o!

It would look as if the problem is the phone or the Internet or the social media. No! The problem is wrong attitude, wrong use; in fact, BAD use. If the those that made the phone or allowed us to use social media “free” does this all the time, would they even be able to have enough time to finish producing the phones in commercial quantities for others to buy? It is a matter of wise use, of being selective in picking what to read, what to respond to or to ignore, and what to commit oneself to. I pointed out earlier that one reptile somewhere armed with a cheap android phone and connected to the Internet may lure one into an unnecessary debate. That happens all the time on social media and listservs because we are not selective in reading, commenting, or responding to posts. Sometimes, one has to ignore a negative comment from an idiot and allow others online to see his or her idiocy. The fellow may just be setting a trap for you, for you to go down the gutters with them. Leave them to swim alone in the gutters. When they are tired, they get out: if and only if they can get out without stinking!

That one has ignored a negative comment does not make one a coward. It rather raises one higher on a moral scale. I need to point out here that each time one opens one’s mouth or writes something down for public consumption, one is subjecting oneself to public scrutiny. One is actually the custodian of one’s face in discourse; and it is not just what others say, not what one says or does. So, reveal yourself and harm yourself. Even boasting (to clean up, to undermine) could have a negative impact on one’s face.

Let us try to be uncomplicated about this. So, precisely, I advise you as follows:

1.   Be selective in handling the deluge of information on social media;
2.   Know that some of the information could be injurious to your  health and in other aspects – could be dispensable stressors asking to be discarded;
3.   Some of the information could be false and mischievously misleading;
4.   Avoid traps, even when invited to participate, especially from sources that may want to dag you down the gutters with them, by engaging you in interminable debates in which the main goal is to be seen as the winner;
5.   Learn to use your silence wisely; silence is also speech and a helpful discourse strategy;
6.   Do not be tempted to comment on every issue, especially the ones that already have entrapment angles. Commenting on every issue makes you vulnerable. Remain unpredictable in discourse. You are on a slippery village square now.
7.   Above all, have it as a top priority that your daily accomplishment does not depend on how much time others have caused you to squander!

You would recall that I put “free” on quotes above in talking about the Internet. The Internet and its social media are NOT really free. They come with a bill you must pay, somehow. First, that social media platform that pretends to be free, to be about protecting your interest, is NOT. It is a means of studying you, of profiling you, of knowing you more closely, of predicting you faultlessly and scientifically. You are being watched. The idea that it is free is a trap itself, a trap you cannot resist! One day, all the updates you have made, the comments and reactions you have offered, would testify against you. Next time when Facebook asks you, “What is on your mind” and you spill it, know that you have submitted yourself! Nothing is free in this world. Things that are marked “free” should arouse your suspicion!



Comments